|
Name:________________ Professor___________________Semester______Year_________
Did it grab attention & establish a focus for the message? _____ x 3 =____
5. Introduction was very creative and drew the audience to the topic. 4. Introduction drew the audience to the topic. 3. Introduction was straight forward and on topic, but was not interesting. 2. Introduction was confusing and not well organized. 1. Presenter did not have an introduction.
Was the body of the message clearly and logically organized, and easy to follow? Did the presenter rehearse and observe the timing restrictions? _____ x 6= _____
5. Presenter was completely prepared; message was clearly organized and easy to learn from. 4. Presenter prepared for the presentation but might have needed a couple more rehearsals; message was difficult at times to follow. 3. Presenter was somewhat prepared but finished in less than 5 minutes or more than 7. 2. The presentation was hard to follow at times and timing restrictions were not followed. 1. Presentation lacked organization and was not rehearsed.
Was language clear and appropriate? Did the speaker use body language effectively (anything distracting)? Consider eye contact & centered posture. Were mannerisms effective or distracting? Were vocal fillers used (uh’s, um’s, you know, like)? Appropriate attire? _____ x 4= _____
5. Body language, eye contact, voice and attire were all appropriate. 4. Delivery was good but one area may need improvement. 3. Delivery could be improved in more than one area. Presenter may have lacked confidence or appropriate energy level. 2. Presenter should have spent more time preparing delivery. 1. Delivery was poor and distracted audience from the content of the presentation.
Were graphics strong reinforcement for the message, rather than being the message? Were they too busy or detailed? Were color and typeface used effectively? _____x4= ______
5. The PowerPoint presentation was professional and reinforced the message. 4. The PowerPoint presentation was acceptable and supported the message. 3. The PowerPoint presentation was too busy, too basic, or hard to read. 2. The PowerPoint presentation distracted viewers from the message. 1. The PowerPoint presentation needed much work to support the message.
Did the ending effectively summarize reflections about the interview experience? Not abrupt (“that’s it”). _____x3=_____
5. The conclusion was effectively summarized and was thorough. 4. The conclusion was summarized in an acceptable manner 3. The conclusion was too abrupt. 2. The conclusion was abrupt and not logical. 1. There was no conclusion.
Updated Fall 2007
|