UG: 11/11 = 100%
MED: 12/12 = 100%
MEL: 33/33 = 100%
MAT: 3/3 = 100%
The teacher education programs at Queens are accredited by the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) and the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI).
The NC Educator Effectiveness System (NCEES) is a standardized, common statewide assessment tool used in North Carolina to assess all teachers, including teacher candidates in their first year of teaching. This tool offers components designed to support the ongoing professional growth of K-12 teachers in the state of North Carolina. This tool includes an educator evaluation component, which is used in the first year of teaching following the completion of an educator preparation program. Using classroom observations and other supporting evidence, principals rate teachers on five standards:
For each standard, principals assign one of the following ratings:
Please use the Workbook: EPP Dashboard Home Production 2025 to access multiple measures of the effectiveness of Queens University of Charlotte completers, including teaching performance using these standards. Select the “Teaching Performance” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data utilizes the annual ratings on the NCEES standards to evaluate teaching performance.
The PPAT (Praxis Performance Assessment for Teachers) is a standardized tool that is used in North Carolina and measures how teacher candidates apply content knowledge and teaching skills in the classroom. The results of candidates’ best performance on the PPAT is one indicator of candidate competency and readiness for effectiveness in the classroom.
Please use the Workbook: EPP Dashboard Home Production 2025 to access the license exams data. Select the “License Exams” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data is based on pass rates on exams required for licensure.
EVAAS is an analytic tool that is utilized in the state of North Carolina to focus on student growth over time. EVAAS includes value-added reports and analyses, and include state-mandated tests in the state of North Carolina. These projections are used to predict a student’s future success (or lack of success). The NC Educator Dashboard provides EVAAS data and shows the impact of completers on student growth as measured by EVAAS. The impact is categorized into three levels based on test performance of the completers’ students: 1) did not meet expected growth; 2) met expected growth; 3) exceeded expected growth. Candidates with initial teaching licenses who completed their educator preparation program and taught a grade/subject with standardized tests in a N.C. traditional or charter school within three years of program completion are included in the report. The first year of the completer having received EVAAS scores is reported.
Please use the Workbook: EPP Dashboard Home Production 2025 to access the student growth data. Select the “Impact on Student Growth” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data utilizes EVAAS data to demonstrate impact on student growth.
This evaluative tool is designed to be a final evaluation of the student teacher’s performance. The form is completed by the clinical cooperating teacher as well as by the university supervisor to find a consensus on how the student teacher is progressing. The goal is to provide details for strengths and areas for improvement. The standards utilized are based on the NC Educator Effectiveness System (NCEEES), a standardized, state-specific tool used in North Carolina.
The ratings used on this instrument are:
The standards evaluated include:
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership
Standard 2: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students
Standard 3: Teachers know the content they teach
Standard 4: Teachers facilitate learning for their students
Standard 5: Teachers reflect on their practice
Emergent | Developing | Proficient | Accomplished | |
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership | 0/6 | 0/6 | 4/6 | 2/6 |
Standard 2: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students | 0/6 | 0/6 | 1/6 | 5/6 |
Standard 3: Teachers know the content they teach | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 6/6 |
Standard 4: Teachers facilitate learning for their students | 0/6 | 0/6 | 1/6 | 5/6 |
Standard 5: Teachers reflect on their practice | 0/6 | 0/6 | 1/6 | 5/6 |
This survey instrument is used in the state of North Carolina each year to determine employer satisfaction with EPP completers. It is administered in late spring to principals of beginning teachers in NC public schools, including charters. Respondents rate each beginning teacher they supervise on a number of teaching tasks, relative to other teachers in comparable experience.
Please use the Workbook: EPP Dashboard Home Production 2025 to access the employer satisfaction data. Select the “Employer Satisfaction” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data utilizes the annual principal survey to evaluate the performance of teacher candidates.
Initial Programs: Elementary Education; Post-baccalaureate Teacher Licensure Only Program–Elementary Education (K – 6); Secondary Education Biology; Post-baccalaureate Teacher Licensure Only Program–Secondary Education (9 – 12): Biology; Secondary Education Social Studies; Post-baccalaureate Teacher Licensure Only Program–Secondary Education (9 – 12): Social Studies; Secondary Education Chemistry; Post-Baccalaureate Teacher Licensure Only Program–Secondary Education (9 – 12): Chemistry; Secondary Education Physics; Secondary Education English; Post-baccalaureate Teacher Licensure Only Program –Secondary Education (9 – 12):English; Secondary Education History; Post-baccalaureate Teacher Licensure Only Program–Secondary Education (9 – 12): History; French Education; Spanish Education; Post-baccalaureate Teacher Licensure Only Program–Foreign Language (K – 12) (French, Spanish); Secondary Education Science; Secondary Education Mathematics; Post-baccalaureate Teacher Licensure Only Program–Secondary Education (9 – 12): Math; Secondary Education Earth Science.
Advanced Programs: Master of Arts in Educational Leadership; SELA School Executive Leadership Academy; Master of Education in Special Education – General Curriculum K-12; Special Education – General Curriculum K-12 Certificate; Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction; Curriculum and Instruction Certificate; Master of Education in Higher Education; Higher Education Certificate; Master of Education in Literacy; Literacy K-12 Certificate; Master of Education in STEM; STEM Certificate; Master of Education in Instructional Technology Specialist K-12; Instructional Technology Specialist K-12 Certificate; Master of Education in AIG K-12; AIG Certificate; Master of Arts in Teaching – Elementary Education; (Coming in 2025) Graduate Certificate in Educational Leadership.
Data was obtained from Queens University of Charlotte’s Institutional Effectiveness.
Degrees conferred June 30 to July 1 of the specified years.
2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | 2022-2023 | 2023-2024 | |||||
Count of Graduates | Avg. Career GPA | Count of Graduates | Avg. Career GPA | Count of Graduates | Avg. Career GPA | Count of Graduates | Avg. Career GPA | |
Undergraduate | 10 | 3.682 | 13 | 3.817 | 6 | 3.761 | 7 | 3.953 |
BA Education | 10 | 3.682 | 9 | 3.851 | 5 | 3.738 | 7 | 3.953 |
Secondary Education Minor | 4 | 3.740 | 1 | 3.875 | ||||
Masters | 81 | 3.918 | 42 | 3.939 | 66 | 3.965 | 40 | 3.937 |
MA Educational Leadership | 71 | 3.934 | 34 | 3.925 | 49 | 3.963 | 23 | 3.942 |
MAT Elementary Education | 7 | 3.748 | 4 | 4.000 | 4 | 3.956 | 4 | 3.912 |
MED Master of Education | 3 | 3.939 | 4 | 4.000 | 13 | 3.979 | 13 | 3.958 |
Certificate | 17 | 3.971 | 15 | 3.960 | 24 | 3.896 | 20 | 3.931 |
AIG (GREAI) | 17 | 3.971 | 9 | 3.722 | 9 | 3.894 | ||
Special Education (GREDS) | 14 | 3.957 | 14 | 4.000 | 10 | 3.900 | ||
Literacy K-12 (GRELT) | 1 | 4.000 | 1 | 4.000 | 1 | 4.000 | ||
Total | 108 | 3.905 | 70 | 3.921 | 96 | 3.935 | 67 | 3.940 |
*Only required for Secondary Education Students to obtain a license in specific subject areas.
Note: In cases where there are less than ten students taking the assessment the number passing and pass rate are not reported.
2021-2023: 63% (three-year rate, 38 candidates)
The candidate’s impact in contributing to P-12 student-learning growth and level of teaching effectiveness in applying professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions is assessed through the PPAT portfolio completed during student teaching. The PPAT portfolio assessment measures candidates’ readiness to teach effectively through their demonstration of assessing student learning needs, effectively interacting with students, developing and implementing effective lessons, and designing and using assessments to make data-driven decisions to inform teaching and learning. Data was obtained from the NCDPI Dashboard.
2020-2021: 91%
2019-2020: 100%
The impact on P-12 learning and development, indicators displaying the level of teaching effectiveness in applying professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions, and the satisfaction of employers and employment milestones from our graduates are reported each year in our EPP Report Card, developed and distributed by the North Carolina Department of Public Schools. Beginning in 2020, NCDPI transitioned from publishing EPP data in the Report Card to now reporting EPP data in the Workbook: EPP Dashboard Home Production 2025.
To view more information on trends in educator preparation view the dashboard at Workbook: EPP Dashboard Home Production 2025, select a trend, select to filter by EPP, then select “Queens” as the EPP. In each instance, please adjust the “by EPP” display to “Queens” and the “year” display to the most recent year available. An overview of each available area is listed below.
Note: In cases where there are less than ten students for a particular cohort, survey results are not reported.
Select the “Program Details ” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. Next, select “Community Partners” from the top line tabs, and then “Faculty and Supervisors” to see additional information on our programs. Narrative responses from EPPS describing overview and approach.
Select the block for “Enrollment”. Find the “by EPP” chart and scroll down to find “Queens University”. Select Queens to open up details. Under the “display” heading, select “first-year”, “completing” and “all” to further analyze the available data. This data pertains to initial teaching licensure only, and would not include other candidates, such as the graduate students in Educational Leadership. This data can also be viewed by candidates pursuing initial licenses – beginning, enrolled and completing.
To view the GPAs of our school’s candidates prior to starting at Queens, select the block for “Academic Preparation” then select on the appropriate year under “Years to display”. Find Queens under “by EPP” to open specific data. GPA at entrance to program.
Select the “candidate satisfaction” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. Results from annual survey of recent EPP graduates.
Select the “Initial licenses ” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. Candidates receiving initial licenses vs. traditional and alternative.
Select the “License Exams ” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. Pass rates on exams required for licensure.
Select the “License conversions ” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data tracks candidates who were licensed in 2022 and have since converted licenses.
Select the “Initial Employment ” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data tracks teacher candidates and can be viewed within the first year, second year, and third year. This data shows the percentage of EPP completers who go on to teach in a NC public school.
Select the “Early Career retention ” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data tracks the percentage of completers in teacher education programs who teach at least two years in NC public schools.
Select the “Impact on Student Growth ” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data utilizes EVAAS data to demonstrate impact on student growth.
Select the “Employer Satisfaction ” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data utilizes the annual principal survey to evaluate the performance of teacher candidates.
Select the “Teaching Performance ” block and find the appropriate year and “Queens” to view data. This data utilizes the annual ratings on the NCEES standards to evaluate teaching performance.
School partners and internal and external stakeholders serve on the Cato Teacher Education Committee (TEC). The TEC consists of teachers from the local school district, alumni, current students, principals from our Professional Development Schools, faculty from Cato, and Content Areas represented in the Secondary Education program.
This advisory committee works together engaging all partners in an ongoing collaborative process to ensure all stakeholders are involved in the development, maintenance, and modification of programs. The committee meets quarterly throughout the academic year and engages in data analysis and continuous process improvement through a focus on critical topics, including but not limited to:
This information becomes the focus of the TEC for the year in addition to the routine business that is required at each meeting. In addition to the TEC, the collaboration between Cato and partners takes place on an individual, situational basis.
The Cato Graduate Advisory Council, instituted in the 2024-25 academic year, consists of educators from the region and faculty from Cato. This council is focused specifically on the Cato graduate programs. The group meets quarterly throughout the academic year and engages in data analysis and continuous process improvement through a focus on critical topics, including but not limited to:
The Cato School of Education is proud to engage in a strong partnership with the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School System as we work collaboratively in the preparation of educators and educational leadership.
CMS/Cato Memorandum of Understanding
The following shows the hiring rates of program completers who were employed in education positions following graduation. Data was obtained from Cato School of Education program completer surveys as well as First Destination Surveys.
UG: 11/11 = 100%
MED: 12/12 = 100%
MEL: 33/33 = 100%
MAT: 3/3 = 100%
UG: 100%
MED: 85%
MEL: 98%
MAT: 100%
SELA: N/A (there was no SELA cohort during the 22-23 academic year)
UG: 83%*
MAT: 100%
MEL: 100%
SELA: 95% of the program completers who primarily worked with students (serving as counselors, teachers, etc.) now work primarily with teachers in an administrative role (specifically as District Specialists along with MCLs, Facilitators, and Deans).
*This percentage reflects 2 graduates who did not join the education work force because they pursued the new 5th year graduate program at Queens and did not want to teach while pursuing master’s degree. Therefore, all completers who applied for jobs were offered a job and are currently teaching.
UG: 67%*
MAT: 100%
MEL: 100%
SELA: 94% of the program completers who primarily worked with students (serving as counselors, teachers, etc.) now work primarily with teachers in an administrative role (specifically as MCLs, facilitators, and deans).
*This percentage reflects two graduates who did not join the education work force because they pursued the new 5th year graduate program at Queens and did not want to teach while pursuing master’s degree. Therefore, all completers who applied for jobs were offered a job and are currently teaching.
UG: 100%
MAT: 100%
MED: 100%
MEL: 100%
SELA: 88% of the program completers who primarily worked with students (serving as counselors, teachers, etc.) now work primarily with teachers in an administrative role.
UG: 100%
MAT: 100%
MED: 100%
MEL: 100%
SELA: 90% of the program completers who primarily worked with students (serving as counselors, teachers, etc.) now work primarily with teachers in an administrative role.
Student loan default rates are obtained by the Federal Student Aid: An office of the U.S. Department of Education. The default rate for FY2020 (the latest rate available) is 0.0%.
Data was obtained from the Queens University of Charlotte Financial Aid Office.